Letters to the editor

July 18, 2008 12:35 am

Team thanks supporters

To the editor:

The Granite State Rockettes AAU Basketball Team recently competed in the National Championships in New Haven, Conn. The team worked very hard and was able to place in the top 10 in the country. Without help from our sponsors, the trip would not have been possible. We would like to thank the following businesses for their generosity and support:

Sunsweet Growers

Smith Medical

Continental Paving

Gaucher Electric

D & R Plumbing & Heating

M & N Sports

St. Laurent Construction Co.

Vulc-Tech Auto Repair

Columbus Dental Care

Prolman Realty

Water Works Supply Corp

Drs. Ahern, Nichols, Ahern & Hersey

Keller Williams Realty

Chiropractic Associates

The French Insurance Agency

Seasonal Specialty Stores

and Michael Dion, DMD

Patricia Tulley (fundraising coordinator)

Londonderry, N.H.

Cancer Plan worthwhile

To the editor:

Over the past several months, the unintended consequence of the current plight of excessive spending has come home to roost. A prime example is the Cancer Plan, which was developed in the last budget cycle to provide breast and colon cancer screening, tobacco control/cessation programs, and survivor support. The Cancer Plan was targeted to provide those most at risk and in need of these services to those who are either underinsured or not insured. Only one out of five eligible individuals receives cancer screening under the existing New Hampshire program due to limited resources, according to the American Cancer Society. The proposed funding level of $6 million for the biennium would provide the resources to address this low screening rate.

Now that the excessive spending and the resulting deficits have become evident, the governor has reduced the Cancer Plan from the $6 million originally allocated to $750,000 (almost 88 percent less) over the two-year budget cycle.

Those who are trying to avoid responsibility for the issue of excessive spending will argue that cutting the funding for breast and colon cancer screening by approximately 88 percent is being fiscally responsible; I disagree with this position. I would consider being fiscally responsible and mindful of the taxpayer in difficult economic times as not growing the budget by 17 percent in the first place.

I believe that our Democrat-controlled legislature and governor's office could have greatly reduced the current stress on the state budget by showing respect for the average taxpayer, which they claim to represent, through spending restraint a year ago. Instead, they grew the state spending to the highest level in history, facilitating cuts to state programs such as the Cancer Plan. I believe that the state cannot and should not pay for every program under the sun. The state should utilize its resources for activities that reduce health care cost in the future. Early cancer detection is a good example of how taxpayers dollars can be spent to lower future costs and is fiscally responsible for the state.

Don Van Patten

Hampstead

A faux conservative?

To the editor:

I have some questions regarding John Stephen's claim that he is a conservative Republican. On Mr. Stephen's campaign website, he praises past congressional candidates like Bob Smith for espousing true conservative Republican values and then snipes at Jeb Bradley calling him, "a moderate." I am wondering how conservative Mr. Stephen can possibly be after having worked on Michael Dukakis' N.H. campaign for president.

In a May edition of the N.H. Gazette, Kathy Sullivan, former N.H. Democratic Party chairwoman and former state chair of Hillary Clinton's campaign for president, recalls how enthusiastically Mr. Stephen supported Mike Dukakis while working on his N.H. campaign.

Mike Dukakis supported tax increases as a way to balance the budget, while at the same time opposing freezes on government spending. After working such a campaign, John Stephen now expects us to believe he is a fiscal conservative?

Andrew Morris

Merrimack, N.H.

Sununu fails voters

To the editor:

Once again Senator John Sununu has voted to protect special interest

groups instead of his New Hampshire constituents. This time Sen. Sununu

has voted in favor of the private insurance industry instead of the

200,000 of New Hampshire elderly and disabled Medicare recipients.

Sununu recently cast the deciding vote against a bill that would have

raised the wages of doctors who treat Medicare patients. With the failure

of this bill, many doctors acknowledge that they will not be able to take

on new Medicare patients and may have to stop treating current Medicare

patients altogether. By casting this crucial vote, John Sununu has put the

healthcare of the 200,000 New Hampshire citizens as well as 29,000 New

Hampshire veterans at risk.

Instead, John Sununu supports an alternative bill that would favor private

insurance providers and protect their profits. For Sununu, protecting

private insurers is a no-brainer, given that he has taken up to $650,000 in

campaign contributions from the insurance lobby. We seriously need to

consider whether New Hampshire deserves a senator who values his special

interest ties more so than the elderly and veterans who rely on Medicare

as their only source of healthcare. It is time for a senator who stands up

for New Hampshire, and that senator is not John Sununu.

Conor O'Brien

Windham, N.H.

Bradley the right person for the job

To the editor:

I am writing in support of Jeb Bradley for Congress: It was not long ago

when we, New Hampshire District One, had a Congressman that would always be

there to insure our needs and veterans rights were first and foremost on his

schedule. We did not have to worry about pork spending as we have now to the

tune of an additional $17.5 million and the largest tax increase in

history. We are not yet burdened with payment of these increases, but be

assured when the new tax rates are before us, all of us will ask, "What has

happened?" It was the election of Carol Shea-Porter and others in

Washington, D.C. who voted for this increase. We have a Republican

challenger in the September Primary, but my vote will be for Jeb Bradley.

For those who can remember our grandparents and parents telling us of the

time when we took a man at his word or we could seal a deal with a handshake, Jeb Bradley is that type of individual. Talk to him personally and

you will have no doubt why I support Jeb for Congress. Please support Jeb

Bradley for Congress.

George L. Bailey

Barrington, N.H.

Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.